- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
9 Q; q2 G2 |/ {; b3 V" \$ K9 wprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated( } X3 J) g: S* z! Q: P
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has0 S/ @7 }$ {, E0 ]) ]8 f1 Z& [
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system- O7 ?8 v* e; ^! K" e
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
. W% d& K }$ a: v- `' I; bby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
, E2 {0 i# Y3 D; l2 phair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-8 j8 d- f5 P. ]$ M& R
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We' Z8 f" d% t& a1 V, v, v
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
% K. L# k5 ?9 x' K6 v5 Senlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-9 T6 _& V: T. o9 p2 d; h
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
1 {& F0 P7 e, A2 D; w8 l' r# U( Gto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
% n4 |* Y; ?3 A3 B6 U |, cthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
+ |" |* \) t* X2 E( Xmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this6 r6 l3 Q1 x8 E5 L
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of4 G6 E8 P, S- z- d* T* C4 }
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
4 Z% K1 A# G& f! G/ ^7 P: Hbly more common than the rare case report in the
. ?1 T, k8 j) m$ Uliterature.4" f1 X6 J# L$ B1 e- \
Patient Report
- {' C' |# T8 m( Z$ I0 [# C2 `A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
" T" G+ V$ K6 x2 p# Uendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
. X8 k' H( i" z+ p( x+ P; ~of early sexual development. His mother noticed9 \# n9 l j/ G# h, b( j6 g r5 [
light colored pubic hair development when he was
" a/ i9 i" Q5 JFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of! f+ e R2 r* ~. v# s# V4 g8 V
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
9 i2 L% i2 H2 ~( G, R5 D! Z3 `Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
! ?2 E' q; Q u% |5 j" @# LProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of# }0 _8 F" `2 O+ ^! N* U5 Z
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;5 s, I5 V, e4 g+ ]* o# x
e-mail: [email protected].1 T: s! X3 ?0 L7 H- D8 f; V& `
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
4 r9 |' ~. X) Q& _darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-$ b( c& n* f! l5 f( q
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
' l9 @4 o% b5 N+ zwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
7 m/ Y" f, K5 u8 L! w' w# h9 Va birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of, r+ R5 L2 j( I1 C; b% i
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year$ Q$ f- R3 f' e9 l4 O4 O
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with& U! {. c3 L" W# U: ?4 K
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
) a6 }" f! I9 r) V c5 Rand his psychosocial and psychomotor development8 n9 G" s& S7 w: C% f
was age appropriate.6 V0 Y6 Q$ Q/ D) `0 [+ g
The family history was remarkable for the father,, [) X1 s. N* b/ b: g! ~
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
% d1 j+ O* Y1 p" Y5 i- R% t3 mwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s1 A: ~' t: a9 ]& D' x- _
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
( X& N* N3 n7 {& ~: Aearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14./ v% Q" {/ t+ t! X
The father denied taking any other medication. The0 }/ ]( J& h+ c% F2 s
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche" ~ C5 t3 ]6 F- c/ E
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
' u3 m' K, I4 n. y* I7 O3 g J5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
% w5 g& ?% u% t" e3 h* }# E5 }& jcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
+ K3 t. b6 F3 e6 A: Y2 ltives. There were no siblings.3 p- G; k# Z- S8 D5 O1 C; u$ V
Physical Examination
( I& f1 z# r& s, u2 u% `The physical examination revealed a very active,
" n$ I# c# f9 w0 Cplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
% V! z9 v5 O7 j0 l0 Xa blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
4 x) g7 F- L0 {% B3 }90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
4 K. g) ?4 C" R# ]' f: u& L. `(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
) g6 b, [/ z- p. uvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
) l# i% X0 t1 O! Pthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
" p L- j0 p2 H1 uThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for1 J5 t' w5 U6 T
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of. Q* e$ r1 M; }( {: i+ _
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
D' h- A2 N+ `) H7 k8 mdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around d3 f9 c. q! {' U' e! H
5403 J/ K/ B7 |5 x/ b! Q
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from. i) e' s) ]; L. G C: w
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The$ V# v2 i" Z9 [" h
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.' U8 |) @ p0 B; f( a8 s" O
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
8 |9 S2 C$ T6 e F C6 X0 E& ?3 Eoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no& ], b# G: ` u$ b' L) J/ ]4 P
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
g7 ^1 b# j: v0 e( E bNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+: x+ q9 z9 B0 s: L
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
$ h8 i8 S- o$ w I$ ] gof papilledema.
2 ^5 c* v: v1 B! j- yLaboratory Evaluation7 V' V/ `& H$ D
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by |# T: n% _. b/ s* f" T
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
2 m6 M5 b: O; }! |9 y. U6 m5 ^logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal& X! I4 @* H6 w+ `7 M% ]4 y" x
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
" y! |+ A, E( w" N6 eshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
% p, i: F5 \$ P2 |lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
2 x, l I% o' h# ~The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood- Z d; n5 ~ U
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were: @5 o" b, q. r4 O8 H
within normal range for his age. The concentration# T# _7 ` @) K( [1 g
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
# J5 J! a- f, l7 v" K(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 204 S+ }1 Z' ], ?8 P' T |5 H
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-! S/ V' K& V. ?
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
1 D/ m- N" T* [, D# cdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
, J, p2 H% I8 I& @( t1 D49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
# [" h9 d; F2 F! ?$ {5 kwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-! V: Y2 w* H0 ~/ ]* @$ H0 M
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
; {0 F0 e; e2 j4 b, Y$ itestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
0 ?6 U! \. F* k: H1 rand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than% v! J8 c: Q6 ^% S' }' q$ H
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular( M8 L8 q) g+ v3 c
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
3 r/ H! e5 u5 l4 v. Lconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
* D' U6 d3 ]* [3 ^$ `: g(prepubertal).
) C2 _ A! e( P0 \9 n% UThe parents were notified about the laboratory; Y: C4 Q! j& e, `6 C$ t; H- r4 g
results and were informed that all of the tests were
! U$ L6 x: J2 c& W8 x4 `7 T, Qnormal except the testosterone level was high. The3 D( i& \' Z K* ^& w
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to/ N4 E, v" a# l7 O+ a3 u
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how- {" I% @$ U4 F1 i
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
) J' R' Y! E$ @ I1 a$ x7 Z. uPhysical examination at this time revealed that the2 X: O5 `9 l' S0 u" H* t
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
) b) w" |8 g' D# _' }' y9 E5 v2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained; I! I, r" O0 A3 A N
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
2 J2 ?5 f% o2 K3 d8 Hpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at" h# \" H$ P3 c
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
& O3 M! s/ f# QmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.' c# s/ m7 E" V3 U s t$ i
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-2 t' n; w. @8 z# e0 O
ing frequent erections.* y. q: t: c2 p2 B
Both parents were again questioned about use of+ ?3 Y, [6 L) w
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to7 D. T' x3 E3 ?# {0 N- g
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the1 q0 p7 U$ P$ _6 d0 @
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
; ]& I, J( p+ e6 Z# `& t' O/ Muse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
' M# Q& x' `3 P, ~ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
( L$ n7 p0 ~) ]) R% g3 P7 na year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
% ^/ K% F) n0 r1 c. ~to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-. E: N g, p4 ?7 c# s' w: R
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
& W& b/ Y: q# `3 M4 {3 jsecondary to depression.
% S, ~( p. I2 q" m. q$ y8 RThe child slept in the same bed with parents., M% r; m0 C2 n! O2 J$ q
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his, [# H7 l; E% t* W5 ~
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-) M7 y$ f: Z* X! A, Z
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
# w( l7 Z* Q1 X4 l6 K3 M2 jThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
) e: G% \2 E1 Uwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby9 ^+ I2 s7 J& C1 f8 q
was high, he then read the product information
, S, T4 e+ p9 T8 K5 ?9 ^3 C2 b, Vpacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
4 t2 l- s0 k% U5 o5 f! n0 p( J! K; ]: Kson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
; s: j$ @* _$ I, c# pdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the" N: u6 K* Y& U
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had, T$ R) g7 x6 n$ l
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
\. }# H$ Z; p- }test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
k n7 L5 q( U5 z% _laboratory to obtain the test.3 U" g) v9 |* L8 R
Discussion' H( z9 a0 N8 D" H' P7 M
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
: r8 Y: ~) [" R9 ]sexual development before 9 years of age.1,40 f6 b1 ^4 u+ C! x3 e
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
! k4 n% E1 k3 Y; Tit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
4 {" h; e4 {% G# j0 ~0 g Bthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
6 C3 s/ p% ~* W# mmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP% @# v, S; w: N: G" J
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
; q+ S& Y9 A% }, y. y8 dresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-$ o9 A* U0 R$ I8 z
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-" N% G$ b) a2 }8 Q9 b
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
/ b+ M8 b/ I1 N! a) D% ~* vboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
0 A9 z( g" a F$ W5 i1 e4 tization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-: O% s4 u: C% @' [7 d8 l
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
9 A1 e% o" H; h; T1 h6 _6 ~: v. ygonadotropins.1,3
4 [% i$ Z$ c$ ?4 b) S% r OGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-4 x8 i: D( M- _" L
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
( Y- g( }4 v( a! n" Handrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or* L0 b% X0 H7 k; U) m
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim- k6 {1 O# {1 G* l
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
E6 o/ N# M% m2 s4 y# I9 Ucongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive" b$ k: S$ v v6 m. h8 H
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
6 X6 j9 `; y' A5 a* J1 m+ cpuberty in boys.3,4
z# k6 E5 ]0 H/ P& i$ P( t) mThe most common form of congenital adrenal1 W, V: g, N/ I6 H8 F
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.% G+ E$ e8 @8 a
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in0 N3 D" b5 l( Q7 w4 \
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
7 B: @8 {- A# l8 V, b- R% R$ man adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen+ ~5 D8 P) x; C7 V: z5 n
excess.1,3: Q: L* _" x! G; H! X' ^7 ?' G
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from0 S& @2 w# b2 _2 K% q2 }
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
A4 r9 _1 q) N) i: M$ [% j; jA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
. f+ ?* J0 Y& Lindependent precocious puberty, which is also known& J5 d( {, w) E0 E
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a5 Q- {! N ]* x- A l
very young age. The physical findings in these boys6 N$ ~6 r( s' G+ _
with this disorder are full pubertal development,, J$ m3 [$ A8 z/ Q' B
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
- G4 b5 q5 o$ m5 ]. xwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder/ H+ f# D% a% }
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
* Y' n! i( v8 q! Hpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
5 M& I X* B, R' x% qreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked+ @0 m+ V9 i! S/ ~
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only
% d, M, [+ @# u, F6 J- e) ]males; therefore, other male members of the family
* A% \2 w3 @; T! T! C* S* umay have similar precocious puberty.30 m2 [" j# x. x# ?% u, y+ L
In our patient, physical examination was incon-* R6 j- h: p* X) j4 h# z
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-- t% p" x9 H- ^% X9 d E
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
9 G. x8 L& j! H2 G& |8 |was in the differential diagnosis because his father
+ U8 `& n4 g9 n& E3 k kstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,5 n, ^' }" e, \+ K; X3 X; ~
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
3 ^1 z1 u7 V" h0 Sbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg- U9 p5 }3 y* v! J& x
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
, s% L, b& c# q( r9 Bbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
@+ `2 _2 ^/ h& s& Keither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
* s& r. w- n# W0 k/ {deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-) s9 J) ~' K0 ~9 p3 B4 b
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.. V" L' s( q$ K
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly8 R! D. V/ C5 Q% L* `, k& s
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because% b$ m5 y. @' J0 ~
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-: I; ]$ i; K# F8 ]3 |" H3 M
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
$ S6 h x( Z( I5 j/ ?decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-. e( t9 k7 w$ D5 e: Z6 i5 q* ?* V4 z) L
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
+ ~6 ]& e# i* [5 f( Gusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’0 ]8 [, Q% B6 ^, \: u
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
, @+ r1 v5 A* _cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
3 S8 z: }/ v7 x2 L' Q. e% Vunprotected females through direct skin exposure.2 ^% ?* w) V7 H2 q2 t g
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
9 O: c4 u9 W# @* b- _baseline value in those females who were exposed to
( T7 l5 O' ?4 g2 u& Y aeven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
4 O! m# }: f5 s0 N- Opartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-2 Y' ]# O( \4 }. S; X
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.) m/ \. ~ Q% J7 _, K4 x
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,6 H/ A8 w, ~5 C# F) k
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that- T, y) J @& w& ~8 u& l6 z
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
- k, m2 V- ^# J& w0 ?+ @terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
, I% y! j" Z' ~, g' Bactive in young children exposed to testosterone
8 M6 _ g" Q9 ]& m; F" Kexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-, x0 o1 b- n% v5 j8 K/ V
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
, d/ t' z, l$ ?, q3 q- U/ ~virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in7 [2 ^+ S" }; }2 H" c3 N
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
; w- [$ u/ i2 E3 vadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
% q1 \. K h) QThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
4 V% v$ ?) X* q b' Zearly childhood on pubertal development and final
* k: W6 ~' j% Y9 h3 t z7 zadult height are not fully known and always remain; t5 k, M2 k+ v6 u/ ?( ?- W
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
6 d' O3 G" Q8 c5 j% H/ }terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some0 Z* P% E0 h( @0 I' q- _) { E
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after9 t% o; \0 a. p' y" v7 l9 f
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
# t) {5 ?- }) y' V! V9 H5 }. \decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
/ k9 J: i+ n& D( g$ q% oThere are conflicting reports and controversy
6 g8 }, Z2 f$ C, ^& Zover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult% m: `% S' F3 V* z* z
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal- b6 }& r1 _2 L& ]4 d6 l3 }
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-6 D; v2 F% H, c, s1 s% w# o' p
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,* \9 s1 b* l4 ~) a/ X G# P9 {
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
8 V& a* T0 x6 Y0 F Vchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
, J, Q+ A1 F% `! z: {/ Upenile length in clinical studies.6 d. }3 C( Y+ t4 |) }6 U( y
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is4 x( V8 ~% m$ o& X, \# B
going to experience any of the untoward effects from8 l0 e) Q; V+ w# }7 p
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
9 H+ v# U9 v% B1 z) z0 @the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
6 K. e+ q2 n- V. F t6 hAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of
' [+ x$ {, p$ j* Z1 J5 g) Qdiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at3 ?; z! |; R9 |' @/ U2 ~ L
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
. y0 L* S; Z% H7 ^height will not be affected.
+ [" Y* F0 V8 |7 m. e: UAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-. H- b2 ^: F0 W- ~3 [- z
ability of androgen products in our society may
0 K! K3 y3 C0 y6 K9 W$ q2 bindeed cause more virilization in male or female
6 e* s* d: k6 y3 Jchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
8 _/ e: T# M& X- j/ G" s4 P$ ngen products must be considered and specific ques-: T- c5 _- P6 L d+ q' f( g5 X7 A
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
: V5 \! W' l) A: ]gel should be asked of the family members during: l2 r1 R- f" @+ U
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
2 A) [0 J; h! J2 Z6 e* _4 oilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-/ i9 ?& }+ Y% G$ K, w; Q- [) L
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
' x( ~8 y1 o% e7 \/ T) p; c2 rappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a& V& O/ k3 G, D, R! k! X: k, Q$ F
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
: q. k% \* Z8 @# ]; fresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive( H# n& Z- ?! V
investigation. The primary care physician should be
9 c9 {9 `% T6 I5 `( a. k; _/ aaware of this fact, because most of these children5 ~$ U* m; V8 R( v& [
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
1 y& J) y4 f' n4 n2 a& ~Desk Reference and package insert should also put a) @; Z( Z, l2 C% C7 D+ e
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
/ ~" ?; l% W) C' G8 b! ]female child who might come in contact with some-4 ]* U" R; _* x" m! w( m" B
one using any of these products.
' b; W5 S' R& H% e; XReferences
( c: Q. X: B# {" U1 u4 p$ U1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation! K" H8 y; g+ N
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric* [' M' }7 y5 T( V3 B
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
m6 `, q6 U& @2002: 565-628.
" y( N8 T" U2 z3 z2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
) z! y( o! V+ npuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal
( c9 p% ~' j, I7 i1 g1 R/ {% x: Rat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from* |. h7 U. |* ~% r' {& W# m+ ~
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 543
7 s- n' K, z' o8 w5 c5 X9 V; I$ Z2 `areas: organic central precocious puberty. Acta Paediatr.. m/ R3 ]4 L' V
2001;90:751-756.
! H5 k5 {. Z+ }* a/ h$ S- B9 x3. Lee PA. Puberty and its disorders. In: Lifshitz F, ed.
) p( m$ V- g+ I5 [- q' ~Pediatric Endocrinology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Marcel8 \8 i, U- _; b4 _5 g- M3 l
Dekker Inc; 2003:211-238.
% C$ r( M( |3 P ]4. Yu YM, Punyasavatsu N, Elder D, D’Ercole AJ. Sexual. ~& l. l2 O t- Y' ]
development in a two-year-old boy induced by topical
& c5 @" ^. E8 ~& U$ n" |( Mexposure to testosterone. Pediatrics. 1999;104:e23.0 R9 E* L I+ J0 U. _
5. Greulich WW, Pyle SI, eds. Radiographic Atlas of
) ` ]3 g7 p2 p: C$ |9 cSkeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. 2nd ed.
5 M% t9 t' B* l0 g0 X( J0 ]Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1959.& v2 |4 @6 g# O: I/ Z3 ]
6. Physicians’ Desk Reference. Androgel 1% testosterone,- o7 c: u& X: {( p, l' e! D0 s
Unimed Pharmaceutical Inc. Montvale, NJ: Medical' h9 A8 {7 c2 n( D+ ~/ z
Economics Company, Inc; 2004:3239-3241.
: s/ s0 n& |% `# T9 s) t7. Klugo RC, Cerny JC. Response of micropenis to topical
$ b- r+ q. z( B8 q) w3 Mtestosterone and gonadotropin. J Urol. 1978;119:) [5 N) Z k: k( w3 b
667-668.3 g! |- E# g& m, J, O4 \
8. Guthrie RD, Smith DW, Graham CB. Testosterone
- @' b* x! I$ btreatment for micropenis during early childhood. J Pediatr.! ]( m. ^) C9 A/ P' R1 ]5 ^' c
1973;83:247-252.5 j. I; c+ f- p& E1 p* T
9. Jacobs SC, Kaplan GW, Gittes RF. Topical testosterone
7 m1 U0 Q3 k- ctherapy for penile growth. Urol. 1975;6:708-710.
, x, ]! n4 D5 ?5 V9 O10. Husmann DA, Cain MP. Microphallus: eventual phallic
9 ?% x3 h8 X- W* ~! ysize is dependent on the timing of androgen administra-( l @) m& ?- s
tion. J Urol. 1994;152:734-739.3 e. {. o" W' i8 F& x$ ~( N
11. McMahon DR, Kramer SA, Husmann DA. Micropenis:
E) q' F* L# g: ^7 t6 Fdoes early treatment with testosterone do more harm
$ R* d/ I: Q7 d2 s& |" Tthan good? J Urol. 1995;154:825-829.
% q% r4 `0 N$ _ C2 @- i12. Takane KK, George FW, Wilson JD. Androgen receptor/ k: B3 U. F4 l4 V* k; A
of rat penis is down-regulated by androgen. Am J Physiol.
0 X6 _5 ~( {* }& u _. v1990;258:E46-E50.
; N( U) @ F# V- ~" r! n- t, J13. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, et al. The effect
$ D! A( G* C3 w. [of prepubertal androgen exposure on adult penile
5 E5 a* X8 d7 R- M- q! d9 Klength. J Urol. 1996;156:783-787. |
|