- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
: |' _: F; s6 @7 V$ yBoy Induced by Indirect Topical- H4 F5 r1 z% B4 L" M" W# }' j- U
Exposure to Testosterone) W0 j; w1 M+ S6 @* z
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,29 J5 V6 O f5 V& R
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1" q3 Q: ~8 U F2 e! O
Clinical Pediatrics
' U `# t2 ?! A, KVolume 46 Number 61 J- P+ W0 A& R7 y0 |8 B# [
July 2007 540-543/ Y& |4 R0 U" X% L" [4 Q; W
© 2007 Sage Publications3 j7 ?! I* D7 d) N6 A3 A
10.1177/0009922806296651
7 J7 I5 [) _/ phttp://clp.sagepub.com
5 Y" J X, y, q4 khosted at
3 ]- R4 `3 E) E4 ?http://online.sagepub.com
6 d& j% N+ A) ~2 f: LPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,3 Y( {1 g! ^$ ^9 x7 F2 w3 @6 _
is a significant concern for physicians. Central W, d h8 V' d4 U* R; h
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
' t9 t6 c/ {0 Y' F/ g; Tthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
0 T9 c$ t% e4 @6 ]a higher incidence of organic central nervous system( Y# t9 U. V. V5 q0 }
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested5 k5 `5 d& B/ {
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic! W' c4 b' O9 a( X( c2 S
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
$ O6 v4 Q0 p& g8 l( k7 h/ @cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
3 ~% z4 ^5 V3 L) v' R9 ]report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the% r% R# @) k! I! _9 {
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-" N7 e- J. h& r! U T( g. j
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
/ @7 I: t! N$ Qto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by/ b8 c$ s5 q8 k) w% Y( Y
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-. @* @0 }* D* z. V
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
+ Z: j5 S% U8 w& X* t* achild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
+ C6 B7 x( R% y. B9 P% e5 F+ `, Mtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
" n7 o6 {( T* Z2 M; Cbly more common than the rare case report in the/ Z* k) y0 I+ w. \
literature.4
?. z* R! w' s; V" RPatient Report
9 {! t4 K" |7 I. s( p8 PA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
! K; R; i- n2 W4 Y4 f* Cendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
! {. K3 j4 ^4 A) b7 p1 oof early sexual development. His mother noticed5 B( G4 b7 R* v: o3 N/ H, b
light colored pubic hair development when he was) b, s* w2 f1 s
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of, ^7 _7 ]' K5 J2 r/ T
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.3 [1 j4 p6 ?" v6 T6 C7 m
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,0 j* e8 Z7 C+ n8 f2 x) \
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
* P u, d# h! V3 x/ DMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
: t8 L; o) y4 e- fe-mail: [email protected].8 E" ?2 M @4 o1 e8 ~8 H ^/ J
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
( z" Y$ H2 s) o' q; o3 xdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
' C7 N4 K& ^1 Z7 Sment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
# U, \ ~+ _+ @was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with$ {" [* U2 w2 ~3 }9 M: D2 S
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
6 o0 ]( ^1 Q4 G- e2 q! Y6 c f ~20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
: _. C4 f0 ]9 y7 A) p5 |9 x: Bof life and was still receiving breast milk along with, W0 z+ E) A: p5 I3 {6 Y6 z, C2 Q
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,) p# V; { o9 `* |! i2 B I
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development* _8 E8 o* H# z
was age appropriate.
1 Q \) W% A: q9 H4 S8 `: HThe family history was remarkable for the father,
4 f+ @' J5 u* ^1 t5 \+ F9 Vwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,( k3 E: @8 q- r( p" ^& Z
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
4 D) O9 a" ?% Y% F1 Theight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
- _( z1 i" \( u# }1 b2 Bearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.' A( g# _& j8 A- N( A* L+ K$ R
The father denied taking any other medication. The
/ G% r! Z4 h: Xchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche& J! r3 E* w! Y$ Z5 \( J, z; r! F
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
, D. `4 I, a/ G* ]$ a5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
0 k- K, p6 f( u% Jcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
, t& Z* R; {7 [3 J, ]$ s# btives. There were no siblings.. v+ J* W* Y# b+ `
Physical Examination9 ^5 b5 P/ C, k+ `, W, G
The physical examination revealed a very active,# g0 B& i% p# @) e
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented) _7 s1 y8 R3 t p
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was$ V9 Z4 [1 W) D. L) [
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
7 P9 z/ p" h7 U' D& Y2 m% w(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
. W# O/ ]; G+ Mvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of3 ?2 k9 [( U6 n0 a+ c7 P* I
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
3 U# |' |, b- f) f4 c3 TThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for+ V8 L ~8 Y% X9 c. @& ?' f" q
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of Q* p6 I: ?+ k
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well' p) [3 u9 X5 G0 w) f8 O& O
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
: R* P9 l0 p7 b |" R5407 ?2 O2 S" R- s$ j. Y
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from. @2 i4 m/ X4 N$ ]' h8 y
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The5 S8 j. A& w4 O% {
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.3 A0 X% g) L" B& s
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
# ?: M6 u8 i+ H1 \1 s& C( Uoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
7 b2 ?( m+ S, ?abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
& X7 C7 v0 k7 ~& v9 O1 YNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+) Z! n8 G; m2 {7 n" Q2 U# M. n
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion- O: u5 \( X1 I$ R
of papilledema.
B, R, r5 C* I9 |Laboratory Evaluation* i5 f( @6 _" q' l2 P
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
! h3 {' ?3 c, Y% `using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
! R' P H+ P3 S& Z2 slogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal8 J: g7 _: a) D3 C
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test# P7 `0 ]( N2 [' {
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-) {& L0 K* x& G+ n, d
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
5 h# v5 A& G& I6 y* ?+ zThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood5 o6 }& |2 x; [' X. P- n4 r, c
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
! @' q. q9 K# i: mwithin normal range for his age. The concentration
z) H$ m$ @) r' h5 uof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL" @2 ^# z5 l& X0 i9 i
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
$ R G' M# J! A' ^ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-: U. s( h) c1 i: h, e: k
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL)," v+ j L' N0 ?8 y) B4 ~6 ^2 x
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
_! [, [7 H: F) d! f6 ]% W49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)7 A; V" {, \. U
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
" Z& R" p% U+ C, Itisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
" [: c+ g. `# B1 _testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
; W# H% p; x! w% L- ~! Tand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
8 _ T8 q$ l" s9 z; I" f; j5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular9 N& Y: F k y' B7 ?" D" G
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone& Z. X2 Z% J& P, k' N7 l% a* U
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL2 e4 D! `$ M+ R/ x
(prepubertal).
3 h7 V( O& S: \0 M: u( Y% EThe parents were notified about the laboratory0 N6 H5 X/ Z; w7 K0 |: s
results and were informed that all of the tests were5 E6 Q: D" F' D4 Y; H
normal except the testosterone level was high. The4 l" T# S% h: |
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
# B* ^& D# }. [- i' E: Q5 Q6 `4 l0 sobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-: S( `* W3 z1 X) M c" Y3 w
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
% I5 X8 ]3 Z( R" e4 Y9 x% ^1 }Physical examination at this time revealed that the
, k8 n# c: E# c' ^+ bchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained# I w( n$ |; S( l# r- T
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained* J n. _- {6 c* X o# z
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-, I+ ?' K8 u- `
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
; [4 g2 m6 u: F8 z Vthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
: k7 }: G# q3 O( l- [2 N2 ZmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
$ t6 v# M. z0 t& n6 mThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-; C. _5 k8 p' `+ k9 n# {' f
ing frequent erections.: S( x, b1 c2 o# o% Q
Both parents were again questioned about use of% f+ ^" v% r/ K* i8 S
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to( k4 J' P9 c) x1 @& f! j8 N
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the: X* |% t9 V! A' y' E2 R# V
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
* T4 r& K8 t& D) }8 `use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-3 U% d' V5 {9 a6 u2 x; g* J6 L# T
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
0 z- O. A/ M9 k( Da year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
1 s4 o1 r' G0 n* b4 L3 e _to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
0 I1 c/ b$ s, g4 _0 Q" t( ^scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
- ^' D! a) \) S8 h2 b. gsecondary to depression.
}' k9 |4 H# M: N" ]The child slept in the same bed with parents.
, P' s# r; l" zThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his: k0 F3 U/ _! o1 K+ D2 y
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
/ `2 @+ o( W( s+ D Q: T- ^nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
+ m3 @) y0 x9 o+ U, n3 S( W5 i7 QThe father also admitted that after the phone call,# j- }4 W, t x* z3 @: q8 r
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
2 g/ s2 r4 W) ]. g' cwas high, he then read the product information
; n7 A; k7 ]8 \6 \, `packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
$ |9 {9 R+ t: \son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they6 J ~$ p$ S6 @ G7 ]
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
' T# m T$ a& U: ~* Ofather was not hugging him with bare skin and had: v, `5 j c0 k5 ]8 ~( C9 R' J
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone) s2 w# E6 m! N I! e
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
! q2 k; u' g7 nlaboratory to obtain the test.# f6 x8 b3 K/ n% E ~# h
Discussion
. ` R1 |! Y" L2 f5 FPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary \1 M3 p) C; \# l2 i5 l
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
j4 s! y0 H1 K# R4 A6 O2 {Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when0 r. E( Q! f6 G) {, {* z
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
, N( Y5 I( }( \8 _2 z. g1 W( `; Athalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-. U; w; E8 }: i% u
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
7 ]7 U" m9 x+ U( ~may have a central nervous system lesion that is/ ^( K: S6 @9 P: H* {
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-6 {2 e8 r. H6 [6 K; W+ o
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-% V* n& G3 ^1 k; P( b! D0 n- K! M
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in+ i# l. C1 o F) U) K1 g4 ]. H
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-$ x1 E) U2 e/ t/ x
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-* v( ]$ q7 u2 X+ p) b
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by0 p f% r. C( y, ^( l
gonadotropins.1,3
n- W- l: r+ [ A2 qGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-, o# Z( h) J2 |& w2 ?5 a
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate0 ^9 i8 ~1 [- m+ ?' X1 N
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
3 s' c% g, T1 S0 @4 {$ E5 |3 \exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
$ b9 U$ N* V+ j) T u2 n; Z; _% kulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
- p, N W4 q" Y' l2 Rcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
: V' ]# q& ~ S0 E% Vadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
: D) D, n X6 X3 h! wpuberty in boys.3,4, O# l0 p' L* Y9 @7 k1 E2 p
The most common form of congenital adrenal+ V* f/ H6 r5 T* n
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.5 g' U" ^1 a) P* Q+ Q0 a
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
( [. p N) p6 s5 aexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
) E6 { s$ L Z: o4 n& n9 {2 Tan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen3 a" [1 U$ }" V S1 A
excess.1,36 O! S/ w0 g- c! A+ \( S1 P) Y R
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
0 @" R4 d9 W6 G" k542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20078 M7 Q' p6 v! j/ l! R+ r
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-( [! ~; ~" m0 O5 G3 \, f' R
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
% h$ ^! F7 K1 c) \5 N+ h7 T! bas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
& d+ T) c5 h: I' Hvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
1 A9 z+ Y; M" G5 owith this disorder are full pubertal development,
1 {5 k. B' ]8 w; ?) F7 P' _( aincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys" B. `6 ?$ O8 X' w7 W3 k
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder+ q. c0 o! o& ^; C) V
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
+ t/ C% q7 N0 ?: x* t3 Zpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
# F6 X4 z% @4 E/ dreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
1 i7 y9 y' M/ ~autosomal dominant disorder that affects only& \$ S, q8 Y3 _: O# |7 @
males; therefore, other male members of the family
; }9 e7 e- |3 V, @may have similar precocious puberty.3
# D! R! d3 e" \/ t, OIn our patient, physical examination was incon-2 H# G+ ~" |) F6 H7 Y( f8 N6 d
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-5 e0 C9 p, z1 T: ~) m: S& r
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis7 y' G! z* b& F! [2 p% O
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
7 |3 K4 D1 U- v1 ^ k1 @) |0 f5 zstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
2 V7 Z2 }& \# O, k& qtesticular enlargement is not that evident in the! T8 [0 b& @# v/ A
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-/ h8 S- U% S6 H" d" s
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
U9 m9 e( Z0 C7 a# Dbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia," t- z `# p) v9 H8 P- U, M
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
5 D+ O% z2 Y& t& Z! y6 M% Mdeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
/ i$ w: O6 P5 g% J; v; n$ Ging the normal level of adrenal steroids.9 P) i$ ^+ G1 ^ E' h& I) N$ L
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
1 w& K( f% }$ t$ V! S$ A0 y6 [2 ?suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because6 b2 V. I" L1 f. @ R) t
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-6 N9 N, r9 U/ c" L5 M. e
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
# U/ l$ E" b- K0 n4 _decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
. M5 O2 Y/ B& O# _4 nterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
/ ?/ [! x1 d" n, h, b3 s' Vusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
5 |& F [& z* @ }. R" \4 ?9 UDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or3 z6 h/ U: u2 ~6 h5 X% [/ _/ G( H
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to2 m2 A7 y, x. N( D( Z& K
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
) X0 H0 h6 A) i( Y6 Z9 gSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
' U+ z- s$ `' K% W9 {; obaseline value in those females who were exposed to0 {( Q4 L' d4 X+ [7 X
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
4 w8 j' ]* K+ r- f( q' Cpartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-7 z2 |) N& f/ C$ x7 o0 I! o: `
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.4 l, j$ ~% W& r+ H" f/ J0 V
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
9 w5 s8 V, L+ M* ~: v2 r: W5 bwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
) _$ Q& E3 ~; ^2 ^! { k+ Bdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-5 x; e) D6 m& ^( G
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
* a: t T/ ?1 w" B! M5 _active in young children exposed to testosterone+ h" Z. N" K3 H; z' [3 F ^
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
4 E; ]( G& V bdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
3 a( r! T4 H, R; `& qvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
( c' a5 [4 z+ T/ Achildren results in an increase in growth velocity and" g' a4 o6 Q+ c/ k( ?- G O
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.- l- r6 f3 u& D% q" q# V
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during. v5 ?, u4 a( l: R Y9 a$ K
early childhood on pubertal development and final
- w. Y0 \5 a4 Wadult height are not fully known and always remain2 p1 S& [- D: S7 v* s
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-( D* c8 d% o4 ~ x
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
: v% R0 S6 f0 e5 E6 |* `acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after( X5 K: }9 o5 F/ x
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation9 C# t+ w. B* k/ @& {; q3 N2 q3 B
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
+ b8 g( x9 B! n1 FThere are conflicting reports and controversy
: A3 U5 ^* g7 C1 C, g% T; g, `4 `over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
% L; Y) \0 @2 a" m$ O9 r" S2 zpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal4 d/ r# \) _# k; g( h/ B/ n( @
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
; m8 q6 ] Y+ a5 H0 ]1 }ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,3 Q3 U/ `1 Z8 z' o v
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between+ O9 Y$ g% t2 o6 `: v
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult: [4 R5 l9 s: l; x# F9 S
penile length in clinical studies.* Z3 L7 t* h% D# u
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
g6 C/ ] K4 d- E8 `8 @% ~going to experience any of the untoward effects from% c, W9 ]2 R( n" V8 a: E5 f; O* I
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because# V) T5 s+ S8 z- }& `% e
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.% N& z' Z7 |8 R0 C' T
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of1 C& Y' ?. S) W
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at+ ]4 R: ]4 @ H) F' W4 a
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult& H* ?# c9 W/ e
height will not be affected.! q/ W' Q, {) Z0 h
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
* D4 C3 y" {9 o$ j7 S3 X9 k( x- Dability of androgen products in our society may) j# `9 l, d5 }2 P
indeed cause more virilization in male or female$ E1 \9 m" W2 p/ P- \9 o
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
5 J+ H( R1 l9 lgen products must be considered and specific ques-
; X/ E, E' L" `tioning about the use of a testosterone product or4 l5 l5 K# n& X# R0 ^; N
gel should be asked of the family members during f) @, k- W" P; {; }9 N
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
/ K. w8 P# h: J) Gilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-% R2 u$ n+ b/ i2 d/ W
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
; k; }* N d( g( vappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
* R) ~* W1 I1 Lhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may* G5 l# c9 f- |6 k8 m
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive( ?+ z* r3 W% U* Z1 R. C1 y
investigation. The primary care physician should be
/ [, x, Z4 N/ A2 @aware of this fact, because most of these children8 o1 j" d$ d- q$ S
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’# ]! T) d: K& |4 G' f
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a/ z6 J- v+ ~6 Z0 h8 G5 @
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or" \5 h2 a* A0 N
female child who might come in contact with some-
) S, D& F) L) kone using any of these products.
1 }) H) G& d3 P* H3 G3 M/ EReferences
r# [8 u2 W+ D& P% R3 t6 {1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation+ L5 h! d7 F$ D7 w
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
2 y j$ ?& D+ W$ A) W* QEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
3 j' n/ q0 p R& L2002: 565-628.. Q! b# ^4 E, X% \, f+ m4 `; v
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious* B C; P# @4 D2 f d% b" b/ [
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|